- 1 Marked below 90
- 2 Markdown breadth
- 3 Cross-manager mark gap
- 4 PIK switch rate
- 5 Distress amendments
- 6 Non-accrual
Indicator 3 of 6
Cross-manager mark gap
The share of borrowers held by two or more managers whose marks differ by five points or more.
12.3% at 30 June 2026 for all funds, against 9.3% a year earlier and 11.6% in the previous quarter.
- All funds
Definition
For every borrower held by at least two fund managers, the senior position each manager holds is compared (the largest one where a manager holds several). The indicator is the share of these borrowers whose highest and lowest marks differ by five points or more. Computed for all funds only.
How to read it
Lenders that hold the same loan see the same borrower. When their marks drift apart, at least one of them is re-assessing the credit. A widening gap is one of the earliest signs that loan quality is deteriorating.
Behind this indicator
Members also see the full indicator set by seniority, sponsor status and sector, and a quarterly note on what moved.
What each level receives →The series
Percent, all funds.
| Quarter-end | All funds |
|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | 12.3 |
| Q1 2026 | 11.6 |
| Q4 2025 | 9.6 |
| Q3 2025 | 8.7 |
| Q2 2025 | 9.3 |
| Q1 2025 | 9.7 |
| Q4 2024 | 9.0 |
| Q3 2024 | 9.8 |
| Q2 2024 | 9.5 |
| Q1 2024 | 10.9 |
| Q4 2023 | 12.4 |
| Q3 2023 | 13.5 |
| Q2 2023 | 14.7 |
| Q1 2023 | 14.1 |
Source: Private Credit Radar, version 1.0; SEC EDGAR schedules of investments, filings pulled 19 September 2026. Download this series (CSV) · Method